September 21, 2014

NEWS: Russia to fly Open Skies treaty flights over the US between September 21 - 29

Tu-154M Lk-1
Photo Credit: Mark Kwiatkowski
It fascinates me that every time there is an Open Skies Treaty-sanctioned overflight of the US by a Russian spy observation plane (in accordance with the treaty it has US personnel on board too) there isn't a peep in the US Media.  I can only assume this is because Americans would freak out and riot of they knew they were being photographed from above by a Russian observation flight.

ITAR-TASS: Russia - Russian inspectors to make Open Skies flight over US

MOSCOW, September 21. /ITAR-TASS/. A group of inspectors will begin a monitoring flight by observation aircraft Tu-154M Lk-1 over the United States under the International Open Skies Treaty, the acting head of the Russian National Centre for Reduction of Nuclear Danger told Itar-Tass.

“An observation flight at a maximum distance of up to 4,900 kilometres will be made from September 21 to 29 from the Open Skies airfield Wright-Patterson, Ohio,” Ruslan Shishin said.

The Russian observation aircraft would make a flight on a route coordinated with a party under observation and American specialists aboard the airplane would control how monitoring equipment was used and the treaty’s clauses were fulfilled, he said.

The observation flight is made to make military activity of the signatory nations to the treaty more open and transparent and to step up security through higher confidence-building measures. This is the 30th flight Russia makes over the territory of the treaty’s signatories in 2014.

The Treaty on Open Skies was signed in 1992. As many as 34 countries joined the agreement. Observation flights are made over Russia, the U.S., Canada and European states. Open Skies top tasks are development of transparency, assistance to supervision over fulfilment of the arms control agreements, broader capacities to avert crises and settle crisis situations within the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and other international organisations.
http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/750548


August 26, 2014

Casey 2014 - Trip Planning

[Previous posts about previous trips, planning and history re: Casey and Parent in 2011 and 2012 can be found here, here, here, here, and here]

Back on topic; what haven't I seen, and what do I want to see, when I go back to Casey, Quebec to see the Cold War-era 2.5Km concrete airstrip, in the middle of nowhere, later in 2014?

National Air Photo Library Image
Casey Emergency Air Strip - 1964
(Full-size 50Mb)

topographic view of the above air photo (approximate)
atlas.gc.ca

Yellow Circle - Unknown

From what I've read, I believe the building in the yellow circle is a radio building of some sort; HF? VOR? UHF/VHF?.  It is at a high point of elevation, but I did not find the path up the hill but did try to bush-whack it unsuccessfully on my last visit. 

National Air Photo Library Image
Casey Emergency Air Strip - 1964


Red Circle - Domestic Site

A mess hall, quarters, and all the necessities of a base were stationed at this location.  I do not have a site plan of the area, so I'm not sure what all of the buildings were.  I do know from the last time that there are only foundations which remain.  At the south end of the base there is an underground water reservoir, I presume fed from a pumping station down by the water.

National Air Photo Library Image
Casey Emergency Air Strip - 1964

Aqua Circle - Unknown

I don't know what's there, but I presume it was some sort of radio building.  The elevation is lower than the yellow circle, but still a high point.  Again, I presume it is; HF, VOR or UHF/VHF.

National Air Photo Library Image
Casey Emergency Air Strip - 1964


Green Circle - Unknown

Not sure what this building was either; HF? VOR? UHF/VHF?

National Air Photo Library Image
Casey Emergency Air Strip - 1964
Bruno Gauthier took the following pictures of the remains of a building in the green circle above when he visited the site in 2013.

Photo Courtesy of Bruno Gauthier

Photo Courtesy of Bruno Gauthier

Photo Courtesy of Bruno Gauthier

Photo Courtesy of Bruno Gauthier

Pink Circle - Unknown

These two little buildings are near the water, and might have to do with pumping water, I'm not sure.

National Air Photo Library Image
Casey Emergency Air Strip - 1964


Blue Circle - Ammunition Magazine

Clearly, from the berms, and it's location beside the airstrip, this is a munitions storage magazine.  I believe from it's design it was intended for conventional not "special" munitions.

National Air Photo Library Image
Casey Emergency Air Strip - 1964





August 23, 2014

Air Bases Where Heavy Bombers Were/Are Based

TU-95 Bear-H - April 23rd 2014
Photo Credit: Unnamed RAF Typhoon pilot from RAF Leuchars
http://theaviationist.com/2014/04/25/raf-releases-photo-bear/
Nuclear-capable heavy bombers were based at the following air bases in the former Soviet Union and United States.  These locations were published by the US Government and relate to the START treaties, and I've just correlated with Wikipedia, Wikimapia, and put some push pins on the map.  You'll notice that the US bases are very much intact and active, and some of the former Soviet bases have become Russian bases, with the same planes, or the planes pulled back from Kazakhstan and Ukraine after the collapse of the USSR - also, very active. 








Information about the matching Soviet (now Russian) air bases seems harder to pin down, at least all in one spot, but the START treaties and other sources define them as the following.  There is an impressive line-up of TU-95 long range bombers on the tarmac at Ukrainka and Engels-2, but we can't really tell how many of those planes are air-worthy.

Engels Air Base (Энгельс-2)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engels-2

Dyagilevo Air Base (Дягилево) (UUBD)


Ukrainka Air Base (Украинка)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainka_(air_base)


Uzyn (now Ukraine)
NA - (49°47'33"N, 30°26'14"E)


Pryluky (now Ukraine)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pryluky_%28air_base%29


Dolon Air Base (Погода) (Now Kazakhstan)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolon_%28air_base%29


Belaya Air Base / Irkutsk Belaya (Белая) (UIIB)

Vozdvizhenka Air Base
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vozdvizhenka_(air_base)

Ozerne Air Base (Озерное) (UKKO)

Ulan-Ude Airport (Mukhino) (Мухино)

Nizhyn Air Base (now Ukraine)

Shatalovo Air Base (Шаталово)

Zavitinsk Air Base (Завитинск)

The Soviet strategy would have been to launch the heavy bombers from those bases, and those which had to refuel would do so at "bounce" aerodromes in the Arctic along the way.  Looking at the current state of these airfields, you can draw your own conclusions regarding if they are in use or have been abandoned.  They sure look well maintained, or even developed, to me.  Granted, some of the aviation is civil, but a "bounce" is really only meant to refuel for the 2nd leg of a journey across the pole.

Countering this threat of coming over the pole, NORAD set up 5 4 forward operating locations (FOLs) in Canada where NORAD interceptors could stage out of, and counter the Soviet threat.

Here are those "Bounce Aerodromes"

Sredniy Ostrov Aerodrome (Аэродром Средний Остров) (UODS)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sredny_Ostrov
[No imagery available]

Olenya Aerodrome (Аэродром Оленья)  (XLMO)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olenya_(air_base)


Vorkuta Airport  (Аэропорт Воркута) (UUYW)
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorkuta_Airport


Tiksi Airport (Аэропорт Тикси) (UEST) 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiksi_Airport


Ugolny Airport / Anadyr (Аэропорт Угольный) (UHMA)


Mys Shmidta Airport (Аэропорт Мыс Шмидта) (UHMI)



Rogachevo Aerodrome (Аэродром Рогачёво) (ULDR)

Other air bases of note which were not releated specifically to heavy bombers:

Lakhta air base
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakhta_air_base


Kamenny Ruchey (Mongokhto, Alekseyevka, Mongohto) (Монгохто, Каменный Ручей) (UHKG)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamenny_Ruchey

Bolshoye Savino / Perm International Airport (USPP)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perm_International_Airport

Ivanovo Severny (Ivanovo North / Zhukovka)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanovo_Severny


Kansk
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansk_%28air_base%29

Borisovsky Khotilovo (Borisovskiy / Borisovsky / Khatilovo)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borisovsky_Khotilovo

Savatiya (Kotlas South, Savati, Savvatiya) (ULKS)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savatiya

Morshansk (Tambovo)
N/A

Omsk-Severnyj Air Base (Omsk)
54°58'25"N   73°33'16"E
N/A

Ostrov (Gorokhovka)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostrov_%28air_base%29

Petropavlovsk-Yelizovo (Yelizovo Airport / Аэропорт Елизово) (UHPP)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky_Airport

Chuguyevka (Chuguevka, Sandagou, Sikharovka, Sakharovka, Sokolovka, Bulyga-Fadeyevo)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuguyevka_%28air_base%29

Savasleyka (Саваслейка)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savasleyka_%28air_base%29

Shaykovka (Шайковка) (Kirov Shaykovka, Anisovo Gorod, Anisovo Gorodishche, Shaykovo, Shajkovka, Gorodische, Chaikovka)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaykovka

Soltsy-2 (Sol'tsy, Soltsy, Solcy, Solcy 2) (XLLL)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soltsy-2


August 09, 2014

Camping with insect repellant



I haven't blogged a lot about the "camping" part of my trips, so I should probably spend more time on that.  Lately, because of the volume of mosquitoes in my neck of the woods, my thoughts have turned to insect repellent.

DEET

The 1st line of defence that everyone is familiar with, DEET.  It's the active ingredient on most bug sprays
Health Canada decided that Canadians can't stop themselves from abusing (?) DEET, so they have limited the percentage of DEET in topical sprays to 30%.  The FDA has done no such thing, so I now buy my DEET in the USA.  Thank you Health Canada for limiting my selection in local stores! #notreally  I have found that the "family friendly" 6-7% DEET bug spray is enough for when you're taking the dog out for a walk for no longer than an hour and don't want to stink of DEET all day long.  For camping, however, 50-98% DEET is the way to go - because you WANT to stink of DEET all day long, that's the whole point.  Bugs don't like the smell or taste of DEET, so you want to stink as long as possible.  Coleman, OFF, and several brand names offer high-test DEET sprays in the US, and it isn't illegal to transport them over the border.

PERMETHRIN

Not as well known as DEET, Permethrin is an extensively used insecticide, used in spraying, fogging, for horses, treating clothes to make them "bug proof", and so much more.  Unfortunately it's extremely toxic stuff and kills all anthropods extremely efficiently, it's a neurotoxin, and tadpoles, frogs, turtles, etc.. are all killed by it.  It's bad stuff, I admit it.  However, it serves a purpose when you are going somewhere with more than your average amount of mosquitoes, or where mosquito borne illnesses are rampant (like tropical Africa, or my back yard!)
In order to keep what little sanity I stil have, a friend of mine was kind enough to bring me back some Sawyer brand Permethrin Premium Insect Repellent.  It is a clothing treatment which renders your clothing bug-proof for a month or six washes, whichever comes first. It is worth mentioning that this is what the Canadian Forces treats clothing with prior to deploying troops overseas to areas where bugs are a problem.  Health Canada has not yet approved it for sale in Canada, but you can buy it at Walmart in the USA and bring it back without breaking any laws.  You're welcome. It is still a good idea to use some DEET in case the bugs are foolish enough to land on you anyway.
I can't stress enough how this is lethal to tadpoles, turtles, bees, and fish.  Please use it carefully in your garage, away from everything, and don't pour it down the drain.


Permethrin Clothing and Gear Insect Repellent from Sawyer Products on Vimeo.

The RCAF is going to the Šiauliai Airbase in Lithuania


German Air Force Typhoon lands at Šiauliai Air Base in Northern Lithuania. German Air Force image
As reported in the media, Canada will be taking part in the NATO Baltic Air Policing operation From August/September to December/January, taking their turn (Roto 36) of the NATO allies who have protected the Northern Baltic states.  This mission is hosted out of Šiauliai Airbase in Lithuania (satellite image below) which has been hosting such missions for many years .



So why is this interesting to me?  Well, this airbase is now an international airport with civilian traffic, but it does have a military past (as you should be able to tell from the design). "Recently" it was a Soviet airbase, with forty (40!) hardened hangers made to store and protect fighter jets from bombardment.  Those bunkers are still there, but I'm not sure if they're still in use.  I'd very much like to get detailed pictures of those structures and compare them to Western designs.

This is the QRA area where NATO forces are staging their planes.
(Credit OSIMINT)
I did notice one curiosity when I was snooping the airport with Google Maps around (55.905396, 23.397880)... What is that area, and why are there very large cylinder shapes?  Is it an old POL site?



References:
http://osimint.com/2013/06/14/nato-fighters-escort-russian-aircraft-reportedly-on-route-to-kaliningrad/
http://home.scarlet.be/~jansensa/Three%20years%20of%20NATO%20Baltic%20Air%20Policing.htm
http://www.key.aero/view_article.asp?ID=778&thisSection=military
http://www.lithuaniatribune.com/54267/new-headquarters-of-natos-air-policing-mission-opened-in-siauliai-air-base-201354267/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/melkon/sets/72157643276508614/